Cleaning Out My Inbox

Last year at this time, we had so much news it was impossible to keep up. Restaurants were opening everywhere, chefs were moving, rumors were flying. In a telltale indicator of our current economic woes, nothing seems to be happening, or at least nothing I’ve found has been worth reporting.

I’m more than a bit worried by the lack of patrons in Portland restaurants. Places that are normally packed have been awfully quiet. Catering is very slow. As often in a slowing economy, about the only places that seem busy are the liquor stores. Meanwhile, rumors are flying about Restaurants circling the drain; so many I can’t keep up. If things keep slipping downhill, this will be an interesting Spring/Summer. In the meantime, I’ve been going through my inbox, checking out some of the articles people have sent me that I didn’t have space to use.

—————————————————————————–

Back on February 5th, the New York Times ran an article called “Food Politics, Half-Baked“, talking about the cloning of animals, genetically modified crops, etc.

LAST month the Food and Drug Administration gave the green light to food made from cloned cows, pigs and goats, with the agency’s top food-safety expert, Dr. Stephen Sundlof, declaring, “It is beyond our imagination to even have a theory for why the food is unsafe.” Opponents of biotechnology immediately let out a collective groan of disapproval.

I’ve never had too much problem with cloning. Genetically modified crops bother me a lot more. Most of my fear comes from the idea of large corporations, putting the balance sheet and stockholders before the long-term good of the country. The Times puts it far better than I can:

That patents of transgenic methods are controlled by a few deep-pocketed corporations is also unsettling. One need not be an anti-biotech radical to have problems with a “terminator gene” that prevents crops from producing second-generation seed. Rather than dismiss these concerns (as Monsanto does) or grossly overstate them (as Greenpeace and Mr. Rifkin do), people like Per Pinstrup-Andersen, the former director general of the International Food Policy Research Institute, have asked a profoundly productive question: what are the limits of modern society’s precautionary principle? In other words, knowing that it is impossible to prove a negative, when should a society agree to accept a technology with proven benefits and potential dangers?

Interesting article. I’d be interested to hear what you think.

—————————————————————————–

The Boston Globe talked about SE Portland in a piece called “The Willamette’s Genuine Side“, covering Lauro, Vindalho, Nuestra Cocina. Pok Pok, and Dots Cafe. It’s good to see this part of the city getting some well-deserved press.

—————————————————————————–

Finally, for those who just can’t seem to get enough, Michael Hebb is writing for Arcade Journal - Architecture and Design in the Northwest. In an article called “Table Making. Steps 1-8“, he says interesting things like

and then I built a table. and kept manifesting them. I am little uncertain as to why. but it is now a nervous tick — and invades my dreams (and I pace, fidget, even squint “tables”). the tables have been as humble as dirt and sometimes princely, almost royal. thousands of hands have brought food to and from these tables and countless elbows have come to rest on their planks. but I am just beginning — really just at the first stages of the inquiry.

on april 23, 2006, a different kind of music was in the room. indie-rock-heartthrob stephen malkmus was crooning about old wine and rocking back and forth. gore vidal was on my left, my daughter perched on his knee; he was clearly uncomfortable with her landing — but she was a determined four-year-old and thought “mr. vigaal” was a worthy victim. a thought crossed my mind: why not use the table. use it critically, imaginatively, obtusely, politically and occasionally feign artistic intent — but study it. we have lost tables. they seem to have been swallowed up by our concept of “individuality” — the loneliest, most gratifying concept since masturbation. I’ll spare you more speechifying. I make tables happen. and perhaps someday I will be able to say more about “the why.”

As a friend of mine said, “it’s all so ridiculous that a single quotation would be superfluous.”

Somebody please send him a new keyboard with a shift key. No caps is so high-school 2006.

—————————————————————————–

Finally, for those into such things, The NY Times mentioned Stumptown Coffee while talking about siphon coffee and the much vaunted Clover maker. I know several people that would like to open a siphon bar in Portland, so it can’t be too far away. Check out the photos and article here. If you have an extra $20,000, you can get one of these coffee makers for your house.

Related articles:

Categories: News/Discussion.
Places: Lauro, Nuestra Cocina, Pok Pok, Stumptown Coffee, and Vindalho.
People: Michael Hebb.

7 Responses to Cleaning Out My Inbox

  1. quetranza says:

    > I’m more than a bit worried by the lack of patrons in Portland restaurants.

    I don’t know — we were out on Saturday night and had to call 5 places before we found one with less than an hour’s wait. Ended up at Everett St. Bistro, btw, and had a great meal.

  2. Dave J. says:

    Gah! Hebb! Why are you shouting? You know how some writers are so good that they could make anything — “Whither the Magnet: an essay on polarity” — seem interesting? Hebb is like the opposite — so pretentious that he could make the most fascinating subject matter seem annoying and hate-worthy. Not that he ever DOES write about the most fascinating subject matter, but if he chose to do so I have no doubt he’d make me loathe it.

  3. vespabelle says:

    Yay, Hebb is participating in CAPSLOCK FRIDAY!

  4. Food Dude says:

    Oops! The all caps was caused by a bug in my code. I didn’t notice when I posted. Fixed now. Hebb wrote it in LOW caps. Sorry :(

  5. Denise says:

    I find it very telling that the only proper noun in the whole article that has a capital letter is “I”. ha

  6. MrDonutsu says:

    I agree with quetranza. Long waits every time we’ve been out lately.

    Where in particular is lacking patrons?

  7. Pappy says:

    When I was running a small chain of coffee houses back east in the 80′s, I remember that we had a small but very vocal group of customers who raved about vacuum coffee makers. They wouldn’t use anything else, and would complain bitterly about the failings of any drip (non-espresso) coffee made otherwise. I always thought that they went on a bit too much, but I heard it often enough to suspect that there really was something to the whole vacuum coffee approach.

    That having been said, $20,000 for a “siphon bar”? Really? And you have to spend years kissing Mr. Egami’s ass to be allowed the privilege of dropping 20 large on what appears to be nothing much more than some halogen lights in a box? Really?

    I can only imagine what the price of a cup of coffee will need to be in order to cover the cost of putting Mr. Egami in the tax bracket to which he aspires. Here’s an idea: how about instead of throwing tens of thousands of dollars at this new wonder machine, your friends just buy some Bodum vacuum pots for $70 each and then grab some halogen lamps from the hardware store for $10-$20. Add some $5 timers and my cup of coffee comes back down to a few bucks. Mr. Egami will survive.